

Employers are increasingly turning from arbitration in employment disputes, due to the increased costs of discovery, potential for rogue outcomes that cannot be appealed, and uncertainty over whether mandatory arbitration provisions will be upheld. With overtime litigation continuing to increase around the country, many defense lawyers are encouraging clients to turn to mediation instead of arbitration. Wage-and-hour litigation increased over 200% between 2001 and 2007 and overtime lawsuits have displaced employment discrimination as the most common form of employment litigation.
The National Law Journal (June 9, 2008) (Subscription Required)
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission reported a 9 percent increase in job bias charges last year, for a total of nearly 83,000 private sector filings in 2007. In addition to non-monetary relief, the EEOC recovered over $290 million for charging parties through administrative enforcement and mediation, compared with $55 million through EEOC litigation. Employers continue to enter into Universal Agreements to Mediate with the EEOC, with the total rising by 15 percent during 2007, to over 1,200. The EEOC’s National Mediation Program has a user satisfaction rate of 96 percent, meaning that nearly everyone using the program would do so again.
Federal Information & News Dispatch, Inc. (March 5, 2008) (Subscription Required)
PART27.com, a web site dedicated to providing resources that help organizations, companies, and agencies create safer workplaces, also publishes Workplace Violence, a blog that delivers news and links to resources for employers and others seeking ways to address and prevent violence at work.
Among the stories covered recently are:
Using a mediator who is independent, rather than on staff, and not identified with either side is a key qualification in resolving difficult workplace disputes. An outside mediator may more effectively address problems on both rational and emotional levels, by assisting the parties in viewing issues more clearly and helping them address strong feelings in a safe environment, as well as providing other benefits of mediation.
Gulfnews.com (UAE) (October 2, 2007)
According to a recent BusinessWeek poll, 90% of executives and middle managers believe that they perform in the top 10%. (This effect, known as positive illusion bias, is not confined to managers alone: it can be found among drivers confident that their reflexes are superior to those of others on the road, trial attorneys certain that they have the stronger case, and negotiators with an overinflated sense of their own prowess at the table.)Consider the costs to organizations, large and small, when dissent does not or cannot surface: Abjuring rigorous debate about its merits, a youthful president John F. Kennedy essentially rubber-stamped a 1961 plan to invade Cuba at the Bay of Pigs, resulting in one of the biggest U.S. foreign policy fiascoes in decades. During a 1996 commercial expedition to the summit of Mt. Everest, several climbers, including two of the world's most experienced professionals, died in part because junior team members didn't speak up when their expert leaders ignored their own core operating principles surrounding safety. In 2003, NASA engineers were reluctant to challenge long-held beliefs that foam strikes incurred during the launch of the space shuttle Columbia posed no risk to its fuselage.Consider that the next time someone disagrees with you.
(left: the country's favorite bad boss)
Diane Levin introduced her readers to a great video over at the ej4 Learning Center some time ago but I just got around to watching it today.
In the course of this short video, you'll see every bad boss you've ever had as well as (grit your teeth but bear it!) every bad boss behavior you've ever been guilty of.
A must-see: Impedership Versus Leadership
What does this have to do with negotiation? First off, you'll find yourself negotiating salary increases a lot less often if you have a happy workforce.
Thanks Diane!!
The study, conducted by Will Felps, a Ph.D. candidate in management and organizational behavior, Professor Terence R. Mitchell, and graduate student Eliza Byington, all from the University of Washington Business School, examines the ways in which the negative behavior of proverbial "bad apples" can wreak havoc on a workplace. Unsurprisingly, bad apples undermine creativity and problem-solving, stymie learning, escalate conflict, distract co-workers from their tasks, destroy trust, and produce a host of other ill effects that no organization can afford to ignore.
The study was inspired by the experience of Felps's wife with a bad apple in her own workplace:
Felps' wife was unhappy at work and characterized the environment as cold and unfriendly. Then, she said, a funny thing happened. One of her co-workers who was particularly caustic and was always making fun of other people at the office came down with an illness that caused him to be away for several days.
"And when he was gone, my wife said that the atmosphere of the office changed dramatically," Felps said. "People started helping each other, playing classical music on their radios, and going out for drinks after work. But when he returned to the office, things returned to the unpleasant way they were.
She hadn't noticed this employee as being a very important person in the office before he came down with this illness but, upon observing the social atmosphere when he was gone, she came to believe that he had a profound and negative impact. He truly was the "bad apple" that spoiled the barrel."
The study, "How, when, and why bad apples spoil the barrel: Negative group members and dysfunctional groups", is available (in PDF) at Will Felps's web page.
|
|
This site managed with Dynamic Website Technology
from Mediate.com Products and Services InstantAssist.com Conflict Consultation |